There are two places identified as "Sociedad, Las Villas, Cuba" when searching for images on Cuba (https://www.familysearch.org/records/images/search-results?page=1&place=219). The first one has 142 images. It has the film for Surrey, England, United Kingdom, Court Records, which has nothing do with “Sociedad, Las Villas, Cuba”. Yes, on the right-hand side it indicates that it is the second item on roll. The first item does relays to “Sociedad, Las Villas, Cuba” but that is the third line of the 177 results for Cuba. Similar issues can be found with the other results about Cuba. Removing those “extras” from the results will reduce the number of results associated with Cuba and add the other results to their proper places.
A search for Surrey, England does not provide a similar record result. So that information is "missing" for those searching for Surrey, England record.
The other results for Cuba have similar issues as there are images for Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Japan and other.
All the results should be properly identified.