FamilyTree App ordinances in Ancestors with task, not related to me
LegacyUser
✭✭✭✭
Cindy Hecker said: In the FamilyTree app I am being offered in the Ancestors with Tasks -- ordinances for people who I am not related. I worked on an in law family. The spouse married into my line and I did add sources for him that included adding him as a child in his family before he was married. I added all the parents and children on the census as well as some other sources. I have done this for more than one spouse and I am offered many siblings of the spouse.
I do not mind getting prompted in Ancestors with task to add more sources to the siblings of the person marrying into my line but I should not be seeing green temples where I can reserve their ordinances. His siblings are not related to me. When I click the view me relationship there is none.
I think there maybe a bug in the App. I use Android if that knowledge is needed. 2 examples are ID # GSWX-9HF (William) married into my line but I am seeing his siblings in my temple tasks. Another is Clara #27ds-3qx and her sister Cora both married into my line but their other siblings are being offered to me as green temples in the Ancestors with tasks.
I do not mind getting prompted in Ancestors with task to add more sources to the siblings of the person marrying into my line but I should not be seeing green temples where I can reserve their ordinances. His siblings are not related to me. When I click the view me relationship there is none.
I think there maybe a bug in the App. I use Android if that knowledge is needed. 2 examples are ID # GSWX-9HF (William) married into my line but I am seeing his siblings in my temple tasks. Another is Clara #27ds-3qx and her sister Cora both married into my line but their other siblings are being offered to me as green temples in the Ancestors with tasks.
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
Jessie Hearle said: https://www.familysearch.org/help/sal...0
-
Tom Huber said: That pretty much makes the mobile app useless if a user works on line for which they have no relationship.0
-
Tom Huber said: Thanks for the link to the applicable article. My comment was with respect to the information in that article.0
-
ATP said: Thanks, Jessie Hearle, for that link. I had noticed the difference and wondered about it.0
This discussion has been closed.