Retired Record wants you to View Current Record, but NO Current Record.

LegacyUser

Don M Thomas said:

No Current Record

LegacyUser

Brian Jensen said: Don, can you post a link to this record?

LegacyUser

Jeff Wiseman said: I have seen this a couple of times recently as well, although I can't remember where at this moment.

LegacyUser

Brett said: Jeff

For certain "Sources" that were attached of the "1851, Census of England and Wales" ...

Brett

.

LegacyUser

Jeff Wiseman said: Interesting. However, I am pretty sure that it was in records for Ohio in the US as that is the only area that I've been working in for the past few weeks.

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: This sounds like some kind of glitch. Has there been any correction to the problem. Since the URL to the record was not provided, I have no way to check the situation (it is something I have not run into previously).

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: In thinking more about this, especially with respect to the 1851 census situation, this may not be a glitch, but is something that needs to be addressed.

Where there is no correlation with a source that has "been retired" (or deleted) and an existing source that replaced it (I'm thinking of those Find a Grave records that cropped up a number of years ago when a new Find a Grave index was imported and no longer contained duplicated cemetery listings), then the wording should not suggest that there is a "current" record that take the place of the retired one.