Relationships per family groups
Rose Ellen Jenkins said: I am saddened with the new 'policy' to indicate Gay relationships. This gives a negative statement per our doctrine. I understand it is to cover children involved; however, this is a case that should be handled under "special conditions" whereby help is sought for and given in private communications. This public statement makes Family Search sound like it is caving to the world. It is NOT good. Some of us know the doctrine, but many, many use Family Search who do not know the doctrine but they do know what Gay means. Let's stay with the standard mother, father, male, female family group as far as public viewing is concerned. Please. Thank you for your consideration.
This discussion has been closed.