Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

It would be a positive change to NOT use the gender-related words "husband" / "wife" but use the wor

LegacyUser
LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
January 21, 2020 edited September 28, 2020 in Suggest an Idea
Alice Colby Volkert said: As **** relationship are becoming more and more common this would avoid causing hurt feelings .
Tagged:
  • New
  • Other
0

Comments

  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    January 20, 2020
    Cousin David said: Regrettably, the percentage of the LGBT community that are married is even smaller than the actual percentage of US that identify as such - ~4%. The option in this area for same gender marriages is adequate.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    January 20, 2020
    Juli said: The relevance of new laws and hurt feelings to the genealogy of deceased persons eludes me. I think it's helpful to use the gender-role-specific terms, so that in the overwhelming majority of cases where it's a man and a woman, people know which spouse to put where.

    I think it'd be much more important to replace the "first/last name" labels. They're especially confusing when I switch the name's language to a surname-first language. Call them what they are, not where they occur: not first name, but given name, and not last name, but surname or family name.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    January 20, 2020
    Tom Huber said: The husband and wife designation is common among **** couples. There is no reason not to use such designations.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    January 20, 2020
    Cousin David said: Are most aware of the drop-down box above the name in the “Person” page which gives difference language/National formats?
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    January 21, 2020
    Paul said: Obviously this is not an issue confined to **** relationships. Going back generations, there have always been couples who never married, so the husband and wife terms are not applicable to them either. In the latter case "spouse" is not particularly appropriate. "Partner" might seem a good term, but that is usually associated with unmarried couples.

    Choosing a catch-all term doesn't seem to be that straightforward.
    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    January 21, 2020
    Adrian Bruce said: You are right, Paul. I confess that I've been dealing with genealogy so long that my mind just treats "Husband" and "Wife" as filler text for a number of concepts - and therefore I miss how they might not be appropriate and miss how tricky an alternative might be...
    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 24.9K All Categories
  • 594 1950 US Census
  • 47.7K FamilySearch Help
  • 100 Get Involved
  • 2.4K General Questions
  • 371 Family History Centers
  • 367 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.5K Family Tree
  • 2.7K Search
  • 3.9K Indexing
  • 478 Memories
  • 4.9K Temple
  • 272 Other Languages
  • 30 Community News
  • 5.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups