Indexing Reports
LegacyUser
✭✭✭✭
Michael Kevin Flood said: Is it possible to have indexing reports go back to the way they were in April showing members participating? Are stake numbers are truly suffering because of the change of reports. Thank you. Mike
0
Comments
-
Tom Huber said: Probably not. The trend in the Church is away from reports of activity. Any activity is now considered between the individual and the Lord. Consider that you no longer report numbers for temple attendance, for home and visiting teaching, and even submissions. Any numbers are limited to charts and are not individual in nature.
I would suggest you talk with your local Priesthood leadership about your concerns and see what they have to say.0 -
Francie Whitfield said: Actually, one of our ROC Missionaries made a comment that he has access to how many of our "logged in" Ward & Stake members for the month have actually been active.
Micheal, do you have a ROC in your area? so sorry it escapes me at the moment what the acronym stands for.... Records? O?? Center?0 -
Francie Whitfield said: btw, I am on Oahu and a Temple & Family History Consultant in the Honolulu West Stake. If I am not mistaken, I believe our ROC has been working diligently to acquire records for indexing projects/batches from around the Pacific theater.0
-
Liz said: FYI
Take a look at this Message that recently appeared in the Community.FamilySearch Forum in the Group known as Indexing Chat:
https://community.familysearch.org/s/...
As well as focusing "on having uplifting experiences and producing quality records" ...
Unfortunately, the Statistics of individual Members of Wards/Stakes from Family Tree of FamilySearch were used by some local Church Leaders to Name and Shame. That is why such Statistics were REMOVED from the Family History Activity Report a short while back.
That Naming and Shaming of individual Members of Wards/Stakes by some (probably the same) local Church Leaders most likely extended to Indexing. That is why such Statistics have been REMOVED from the Indexing Reports.0
This discussion has been closed.