[bug] Location being presented as not standardized when creating new profile

JulianaMFF

I get this standardization bug every time I add a new person (new profile/ID) based on an entry that is not yet in the three. Follow the example: Urbano Laneza is being added.

The location was filled (based on the entry) following the date/place standards (as seen in the following picture):

The person was created successfully. When checking the new profile (Urbano Laneza), it is shown that the Place is not following the standards (as follows):

This started happening a couple of months ago and affected all the new profiles that I created recently. If you edit the profile and edit it, the error message is no longer presented. I hope this is clear enough.

Thank you so much.

Best regards

Julia Szent-Györgyi

Unfortunately, the Community software appears to have eaten your images for supper: they're still blue boxes with hourglasses, a day later. In my experience of this software, that means that they will never show up.

There has been a somewhat elusive bug with locations added by Source Linker not "remembering" that they're already associated with a Places database entry (which is what "standardized" actually means, in FS parlance). I haven't encountered it lately; I have no theories on why you have.

Shannon Potter Wilcox

@Juliana Mendes Ferreira Fukuda

There is a crazy glitch going on in the community with photos and hopefully this issue is resolved sooner than later. Would you please redo your question without using the photo so that we can assist you.

JulianaMFF

https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/471905#Comment_471905

Hello, I uploaded the figures to imgur. I hope this helps.

https://imgur.com/a/hLTnMid

dontiknowyou

I am seeing this bug again today. It's baaack!!!

MarlusRech

The concern that I have is that even after you manually modify the location (which in my case the parish is correct, but the city is NOT), the Citation still shows the wrong location/city.

Consequently, that needs to be fixed somehow. There's no point, in my view, to have the wrong location listed on the citation, since the citation generated is NOT changeable.

What's the process to escalate this issue?