When Ancestors are not married
Hello group. I'm a newbie here so I'm not familiar with how to add new idea's.
If ancestor's are not married, why not include a place in the family tree for that? So that the information can be added to their tree?
Comments
-
Ann
Welcome to the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum.
I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...
Can you please explain what you mean by, why not include a place, in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch', for an Ancestor, who is NOT "Married", so that the information can be added to their 'Tree'.
I must admit, I am somewhat confused ...
There IS a place, in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch', that INCLUDES individuals/persons that are not married.
They appear in the "Branches" of their "Ancestral" Lines.
They also appear as both,
(1) A "Child" with Parents; and,
(3) As part of a Couple, although, there is NOT Spouse / Partner.
Being "Married" is NOT a requirement for being in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch'
Within my "Ancestral" Lines, in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch', I have many Ancestors/Relatives/Extended Family who NEVER "Married".
Again, please explain what you mean by, why not include a place, in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch', for an Ancestor, who is NOT "Married", so that the information can be added to their 'Tree'.
We are standing by to assist you, if you need help/assistance, with including an individual/person, who NEVER "Married", in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch'.
Brett
0
