Microfilm 815968 (Digital Folder Number 007562770) incorrectly indexed as Caldbeck
I have hired a genealogist to look up records in Cumbria, U.K., for example Jonathan Nicholson born 3 Jan 1662 at Caldbeck, Cumberland, England.
She found these records did not exist in Caldbeck parish registers (a waste of her time).
I believe this microfilm to be composed of Quaker birth records from the very earliest days of the Society of Friends records, when meetings were held at Caldbeck (the home of the movement's founder) but baptisms reported had not necessarily occurred there. However the associated Familysearch records do not mention religious affiliation. The user is left assuming these births come from Church of England records.
The original for this record is in the National Archives (UK) which tell me Jonathan's birth was somewhere in Cumberland or Northumberland, and that its reported meeting place was Caldbeck - though the place is not in the original images transcribed in 1857.
Can this microfilm be correctly indexed?