AGAIN ▬ WHY are WE receiving "Discovery" NOTIFICATIONS about RECORDS that have ALREADY been ATTACHED

Brett .

FamilySearch

[ Suggested ENHANCEMENT ... ]

Subject:  AGAIN ▬ WHY are WE receiving "Discovery" NOTIFICATIONS about RECORDS that have ALREADY been ATTACHED

... Again ▬ Especially, those Records, that We OURSELVES, have in fact "Attached" (in my case, some SEVERAL Years ago) ...

[ Submitted in the "Topics" of, "Family Tree"; and, "General User Interface"; and, "Other" ... ]

Campaign: Memorial

https://www.familysearch.org/campaign/memorial

https://www.familysearch.org/campaign/memorial

Example ...

"Discovery" NOTIFICATION

Campaign

You CANNOT 'See', from the above Campaign that the Record, is ALREADY "Attached"; but, upon examination, in fact, that WAS "Attached" by Myself, in the first instance, some SEVERAL Years previously ...

Not ONLY the above Record; but, ALSO in the Other ( SECOND ) Record ( ie. Same, Same ) ...

.

CONSIDERATION

AGAIN, it seems, 'pointless'; even, 'senseless'; more so, boarding on 'wastefulness', providing a (particular) User/Patron, with a "Discovery" NOTIFICATION, about a RECORD "Hint", for an/their Ancestor, that is ALREADY "Attached"; especially, one that that particular User/Patron, had actually "Attached" to the particular individual/person, in the first instance, some YEARS previously.

Again, I do not mind the various "Campaigns" ...

Again, I just DISLIKE (and, consider it 'Wasteful', of a User's/Patron's 'Time'), getting "Discovery" NOTIFICATIONS, in regard to the various "Campaigns", such as the above; where, a RECORD "Hint", for one of their Ancestors, that is ALREADY "Attached"; especially, by the User/Patron (themselves), in the first instance, some YEARS previously.

.

REQUEST 

Again, Please ...

AGAIN, can I humbly suggest, that 'FamilySearch', needs to have ALL the various "Campaigns" REVIEWED, with regard to 'sending out' those (ie. ANY) "Discovery" NOTIFICATIONS, for RECORD "Hints" (and, the like), that are ALREADY "Attached"; especially, by the particular User/Patron themselves, previously, in the first instance.

.

'Thank You' in advance.

Submitted for your, information; attention; and, consideration.

Kind Regards,

MAY THE LORD BLESS YOU IN THIS IMPORTANT WORK.

Yours faithfully,

Brett

DavisGGardner

I, too, would rather not waste time examining campaign notifications that have already been attached.

Davis Gardner (User name: dggard)

Brett .

@DavisGGardner

Davis

'Thank You' for the support.

I am so glad to know that ...

I am not alone ... a lone voice in the wilderness ...

Brett

ps: I would not, mind knowing about, the "Records", that have been attached by OTHER Users/Patrons, just NOT those attached by myself; as, I ALREADY know what I have done ...