Review images labelled as 'No Extractable Data' but that is not the case
I have been indexing and reviewing the Middlesex Parish records 1539 - 1988. When opening an image to review, I have frequently found, usually burials for the parish of Stepney, that the first indexer has marked the image as 'No Extractable Data' but in fact here are 2 pages of data, which I have proceeded to index. Has anyone else found this issue? I wonder if it is one particular indexer who has problems reading the writing and, instead of returning the image unindexed, is marking it as 'No Extractable Data'. Perhaps the moderators could look into this.