Add first page to batches of marriage records that otherwise would not be indexed
While trying to see if batch https://www.familysearch.org/indexing/batch/f6b987f5-198f-402c-b2e1-d85b264dfa7c in US, Virginia--Marriage Records, 1730-1901[Part A][MSB9-66P], I noted the instruction to mark a batch that did not show marriage date and parties No, No Extractable Data. One of the nearby batches did have a note "Liscence [sic] not recorded," but no words said what the license was for. The pages--many of them--obviously were marriage records. But I was not allowed to index them. I believe that my image was number 281 or thereabouts.
If the people who present the images visually would take the time to locate the image that has the headings for the images to be indexed in a batch (probably image 1) and post it with each similar batch (which has no headings) as a reference image, the people in the image could be indexed and be closer to having their temple work done.
Comments
-
Jill
.
As an aside ...
Just a suggestion ...
For a possibly quicker response ...
If you have not already ...
.
Can I humbly suggest that you post this problem/issue of yours in the 'Group' being "Indexing Chat" in the "Community.FamilySearch" Forum; so that, the members of that group can answer/assist you.
.
Here is the direct 'link' to that 'Group':
.
Indexing Chat
https://community.familysearch.org/s/group/0F93A000000LissSAC/indexing-chat
.
Description: Welcome! Come in and ask indexing and review questions, offer your help, share your stories, and find friendship.
.
There is a wealth of experience in that 'Group' (both of, "indexers"; and, "Reviewers").
.
The regular participants in that 'Group' may able able to provide another/further perspective on the matter.
.
And, it is more likely to be quickly passed onto the right people in 'FamilySearch', if need be.
.
By the way, that 'Group' is a "Public" group, which may join, if you so desire.
.
I hope this helps.
.
Brett
.
0
