easier access to data on the detail page
On showing the family on the detail page the marriage date between man and wife never shows completely. It seems to be that the word marriage could be moved over a little bit so that the entire marriage date would show without hoaving to go to the page for the marriage. Or marriage could be abbreviate mar and then the full date shown. this would help when copying data making it easier to see the actual complete marriage date...
Comments
-
How are you vewing the information? I have no problem in either my laptop or in the App to view full marriage dates and locations.
0 -
Cindy
FYI
What 'Stephen' is referring to ...
Example ...
Couple ...
"Person"/Details" page/screen (for either) ...
WHOLE, 'Place Name', for "Marriage", DOES NOT appear ...
(1) Browser at 100% ...
Even worse ...
(2) Browser at 125% ..
Brett
0 -
Stephen
.
FYI
.
And, please be aware, I am referencing, the original "Computer" Web version of "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch', and, NOT, the newer, more recent, "Mobile" Application version of of "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch' ...
.
To be honest ...
.
I do not find the 'Date' as being such a problem/issue ...
Whereas, the 'Place' Name is another matter ...
.
In many cases, "Moving", the word "Marriage"; and, the 'Fields' for "Marriage" (ie. 'Date' and 'Place' Name) over to the left a little; and/or, worse "Abbreviating" the word "Marriage", would NOT really make any significant difference; especially, in some cases.
.
Many of 'Place' Name for "Marriages", for Ancestors, in my "Ancestral" Lines, are MUCH longer that what would appear within the 'Field'; as, they include, the 'Name' of the Parish Church (eg. "Saint ..."); and, Denomination; and, Street Number and Street Name; and, Village/Town/Suburb; and, Region; and, City; and, County [and/or, State (or, in some cases, BOTH)]; and; Country.
.
I would suggest that having the 'Place' Name appear on a SECOND Line, if one Line is insufficient, would be a better proposition.
.
But, doing so would use up much more 'Real-Estate' on the page/screen ...
As an aside ...
.
Where you aware that the "Full" name of the 'Place' of "Marriage" can STILL be "Copied", despite the fact that it may not appear.
.
Such can be done by "Double" 'Clicking' with the 'Mouse' on the 'Place' Name (ie. effectively, 'Highlighting' that 'Field'); and, then using the OTHER side 'Button', of the 'Mouse', to "Copy" - the WHOLE 'Place' Name WILL be "Copied", despite the fact that it does not appear.
.
Give it ago.
I do it all the time ... it works.
[ I even do the same in the "ChangeLog", if needed; and, it also work just fine ... ]
.
And, if needs be, the same 'technique' can be done for the 'Date'; or, for that matter, ANY 'Field", in "Family Tree".
.
I hope this helps.
.
Brett
.
0 -
Brett you created examples but those are not what I see. I see full dates, occasionally location is truncated but it think it is not a program issue but a computer settings issue...in my opinion because that is not how I am viewing it and not having that issue.
0 -
Cindy
The 'Date' is not the problem/issue.
[ Of course, if you had some EXTRA deatils with the 'Date', it could be ... ]
Whereas, the 'Place' Name CAN be a problem/issue.
I DID NOT "Create" those EXAMPLES.
That is WHAT "Appears" in "Family Tree" of 'FamilySearch'.
[ NORMALLY, with the "Bowser" at 100% ].
The problem/issue has NOTHING to do with, a Computer; and/or, the Browser "Settings".
The problem/issue is purely one of the "Design" of the Programme.
Just my thoughts.
Brett
0 -
You should really show us a screenshot of your issue. "Marriage:" is never an issue for me to be able to see the full date of a marriage. When I do family history on FamilySearch, I only have the browser at 100% at full or half the screen. If I were to change the zoom, the only time I would not see the full marriage date (at least for 7 November 1908) is at half screen at 175%, 400%, and 500%. And yeah, I never go to those zoom percentages on FamilySearch...
0
