FamilySearch (FS). Indexed Record (ie. Source). In FS. From FindMyPast. 1911, Census of England & Wa
LegacyUser
✭✭✭✭
Brett said: FamilySearch.
Indexed Record (ie. Source).
In "FamilySearch".
From "FindMyPast.com".
1911, Census of England and Wales.
"Middle" names of Family members.
"Middle" names of Family members have been OMITTED (ie. NOT included, NOT included with "Indexed" record).
Yet, the SAME record in, both, "Ancestry.com"; and, "MyHeritage.com", INCLUDE those "Middle" names.
NOT good.
"FamilySearch" should "Definitely" NOT just rely solely on the "Indexed" records received from "FindMypast.com".
Brett
.
Indexed Record (ie. Source).
In "FamilySearch".
From "FindMyPast.com".
1911, Census of England and Wales.
"Middle" names of Family members.
"Middle" names of Family members have been OMITTED (ie. NOT included, NOT included with "Indexed" record).
Yet, the SAME record in, both, "Ancestry.com"; and, "MyHeritage.com", INCLUDE those "Middle" names.
NOT good.
"FamilySearch" should "Definitely" NOT just rely solely on the "Indexed" records received from "FindMypast.com".
Brett
.
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
Paul said: Brett
Unfortunately, you cannot expect help if you refuse to provide examples. They don't have to be your relatives, just any URL you can find to illustrate the problem.
I say this because my great grandfather is appearing just as previously - middle name included.
On your other point, are you seriously suggesting FamilySearch should go somewhere else for their 1911 E&W census records? A van Helsdingen would probably be able to confirm this, but I believe this would not be contractually possible.0 -
Paul said: Not my relatives, but see https://www.familysearch.org/search/r...0
-
Paul said: Brett
Just found this page, which might be of interest. (See https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/h...):
0 -
Jordi Kloosterboer said: I've had this issue to--where some part of the name is missing as shown on the index, but clearly not on the image or the index in ancestry.com.0
