Relink documents

LegacyUser

Grzegorz Woźniak said: Hello,
I use the scanned documents rather intensive, so I discover that some documents are linked not properly.
Most of researches are processed by the parishes. So that some links presented for Radom, Poland (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...) are definitely connected to Odechów, Poland (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...).

This documents regards re-linking:

Births (Akta urodzeń) 1786-1804 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...)

Marriages (Akta małżeństw) 1721-1806 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...)

Deaths (Akta zgonów) 1771-1787 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...)

Deaths (Akta zgonów) 1788-1812 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...)

Deaths (Akta zgonów) 1813-1830 (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/619...)

Regards,
Grzegorz

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: Use the catalog search to go to the catalog entry for the record set that is incorrect. From the page that has the bad link, click on Feedback for the page -- it will be a tab on the side of the page. Then report the issue.

LegacyUser

Grzegorz Woźniak said: Thanks for reply.
Maybe I am not super user for this web site - but I do not see such functionality.

LegacyUser

Juli said: Grzegorz, that's a waypointed collection. I have not figured out a way to get waypoints corrected -- the 1869 Hungarian census (which is filed under Slovakia) has had several towns incorrectly identified (as places on entirely the other side of the country) for years now.

LegacyUser

Grzegorz Woźniak said: Tom,
I understand that there are two "points of view" - the catalog and this "waypointed collection".
As the genealogist-enthusiast (from the Polish examples) I see that the structure of this "waypointed collection".stands from the archive structure in the days of making microfilms (now - out-of date and not relevant for the administrative division).
The results of this two views are totally different.- see the attachments.
catalog

waypointed

So the issue is: some materials, although online, are not searchable - and maybe even not available for the searchers.
Another thing - the result of catalog search pointed me to message "Access the site at a family history center".

So again - the documents are online, but I cannot use them.

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: Mm, I see what you are talking about.... This is a little different than what I was thinking about. In this case, there are "waypoints" that take the user to a point on a film where a set of records for a particular location are found (as part of a larger collection.

I think what FamilySearch is attempting to do (and I could be wrong) is to resolve the problem wherein a film contains documents that are not itemized (that is, filmed as individual items on the film), but was recorded as one film number.

The problem is that yes, there is no feedback for the catalog entry/entries and that makes my response incorrect. Hopefully, someone from FamilySearch will see this and get the problem to the correct people.

In my opinion, it is still a catalog problem and needs to be resolved by the team that does the cataloging and linking of images, etc.

Sorry to have misled you or anyone else...

LegacyUser

Grzegorz Woźniak said: Tom,
I think the discuss is always worth to take, so I do not imagine myself as to be "misinformed" by your response.
I try to point directly to the FamilySearch by the contact form.
The only goal is to make the wide possibility to know where are the roots.
Greetings fro Poland