Temple ordinance reservation list page

LegacyUser

Ella Huff said: Please consider changing back the temple ordinance reservation page back to how it used to be. There are many of us who cannot navigate as easily. It has been changed so it is more difficult to find quickly what we are looking for. We have tried the filters, but it still is too confusing. The lists aren't as easy to read, the colors are duller, etc. Please, put it back to how it used to be, we would surely appreciate it! Thanks

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: There is no going back.

The change took place because we can now pull names that have been shared with the temple without having to request the name be transferred to us from the person who shared the name or by requesting support release the name.

The sorting order, combined with the filter, combined with printed and not printed, are not as easy to use as before, but with a little playing around, one can obtain a list of what they want.

LegacyUser

Linda Barney said: I've "played around" with the filters and cannot get the sorts that I used to get with a simple click or two. I can no longer sort the list by Sealing (or parents). I use this feature every time I'm in the reservation list. I do the temple work by family group and I would simply sort by the sealing to see the family group all together. Also, since we no longer get the temple cards returned to us I would print out that family group to keep track of what cards I had on hand and which ones I needed to reprint. Please return this capability. I agree with Ella that the Reservations page is harder to read and more time consuming with just gray and blue/gray. Printed and not yet printed should be two different colors again.

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: I can understand the problem. In the old system, a user could sort on any column, including parents/spouse.

The best the current system can currently do is to sort by last name with SP alone selected.

My reservations list is relatively small, but that tends to group the families. Certainly not as effective as when we could sort on multiple columns.