FYI. "Ordinances" that were "Reserved" between 2007 and 2009; but, are (still) not done. Old; but, i

LegacyUser
✭✭✭✭
Brett said: FYI.
Just for information.
"Ordinances" that were "Reserved" between 2007 and 2009; but, are (still) not done.
Old; but, interesting!
Wonder if it still applies?
Looking for something else, I just came across this "Knowledge Article":
My ancestor's ordinances were reserved between 2007 and 2009 but are still not done
https://www.familysearch.org/help/sal...
-----
Quote
If you find family names that were reserved between 2007 and 2009 and have not been completed, please contact FamilySearch Support to submit a request to have them released.
-----
I also found a few previous posts in this Form around 2014 on the matter ...
Here is a "Reply" in one:
-----
Quote
I found that no temple work was being completed. I reported and FamilySearch subsequently managed the problems. You should have heard the gasp on the other end of the line!! So many of those names that go back to 2007-2009 should be unreserved and re-reserved.
-----
https://getsatisfaction.com/familysea...
With ALL that has gone on since that time; and, the fact that that aforementioned "Knowledge Article" is still active ... I just wondered if those "Ordinances" that fitted the criteria of "Reserved" between 2007 and 2009; but, are still not done, have subsequently been automatically released and made available.
If they have, well and good; whereas, if not ...
Just curious.
Brett
.
Just for information.
"Ordinances" that were "Reserved" between 2007 and 2009; but, are (still) not done.
Old; but, interesting!
Wonder if it still applies?
Looking for something else, I just came across this "Knowledge Article":
My ancestor's ordinances were reserved between 2007 and 2009 but are still not done
https://www.familysearch.org/help/sal...
-----
Quote
If you find family names that were reserved between 2007 and 2009 and have not been completed, please contact FamilySearch Support to submit a request to have them released.
-----
I also found a few previous posts in this Form around 2014 on the matter ...
Here is a "Reply" in one:
-----
Quote
I found that no temple work was being completed. I reported and FamilySearch subsequently managed the problems. You should have heard the gasp on the other end of the line!! So many of those names that go back to 2007-2009 should be unreserved and re-reserved.
-----
https://getsatisfaction.com/familysea...
With ALL that has gone on since that time; and, the fact that that aforementioned "Knowledge Article" is still active ... I just wondered if those "Ordinances" that fitted the criteria of "Reserved" between 2007 and 2009; but, are still not done, have subsequently been automatically released and made available.
If they have, well and good; whereas, if not ...
Just curious.
Brett
.
Tagged:
0