icon change

LegacyUser

Robert Gary Hyde said: The change in the color code for status of ordinances(icons ) is not a good idea when it relates to the "green box " doing double duty . ( needing an ordinance .and being available for someone to do the ordinance) I spend my time doing original work and now I have to look up every green icon and most are just waiting for someone to do them. This is a counter productive change . I'm a bit frustrated
I would guess this idea came from someone who did not do a lot of research for original work , and just wanted a way to get names done . A good idea but the wrong solution. Thanks

LegacyUser

Roger C. Nilsson said: I heartily agree.

LegacyUser

Tom Huber said: The green icon has always meant that there are temple ordinances available for reserving and taking to the temple.

We are no longer in a position where names submitted to the temple is more important than to have the ordinances performed. Therefore, while not changing the meaning we are changing the emphasis of the green temple. We need to think of it as "This ordinance is available for temple work to be performed." It does not mean "This ordinance is ready to be requested/reserved or submitted/shared with the temple." (This clarified statement was made by Jim Greene on June 17th.)

Jim Greene's two major posts are in the https://getsatisfaction.com/familysea... discussion from June 12th, 2020, and the https://getsatisfaction.com/familysea... discussion from the weekend of June 13th-14th, 2020. The modified statement about the emphasis being changed appeared in the https://getsatisfaction.com/familysea... discussion on June 17th.