A misplaced advisory?
So I found something on the profile of Mose Monnett (GNVR-N3L) today that has me scratching my head. I have been working with the Monnet (Monnett, Monett, Monnette, etc.) for forty years, and I have never seen evidence of a "Mose" Monnett - he could exist, but if he does, I don't know of him. I did find the profile last spring and put a note on it that it was unsupported by evidence.
BUT here's the thing, even though his possible dates on the profile, he's outside of the Quality Score BETA, the profile has the advisory that states "Important research has been done on this person. Please read these alert notes before making changes,", but he has no verifiable sources listed.
Nothing.
There is no verifiable source for his supposed year of birth or the supposed year of death. And those are the only bits of information about him, and all there is a "GEDCOM" file.
I would point out that only one person has contributed to the profile.
Even without my experience on these Monnet, etc. lines, this is a red flag profile.
So my question is, without any sources, being outside of the BETA's identified field, how did this profile earn the advisory?
(https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/GNVR-N3L)
Comments
-
If you mean the Alert Note, you added the content of the Alert Note on 3 Apr 2024.
0
