Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Search

South Carolina marriages in Maryland Church records.

Ann Holladay
Ann Holladay ✭✭
April 2, 2024 edited April 16, 2024 in Search

Why are transcriptions of the St Phillips Parish Register of Charlestown SC indexed to the collection “Maryland, Church Records, 1668-1995“? See the following Source:

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QG2T-D2XK

Thanks.

0

Answers

  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 2, 2024

    Corrected link

    0
  • Ann Holladay
    Ann Holladay ✭✭
    April 2, 2024

    Sorry but I don't understand.

    0
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 3, 2024 edited April 3, 2024

    Try the link in your original post - you'll see it doesn't work. The Community software will corrupt most links placed on a line without other text.

    0
  • Ann Holladay
    Ann Holladay ✭✭
    April 3, 2024 edited March 27

    I see that the original link didn't work, although when I copied it into another message, I checked before I sent and it did. Anyway, maybe this image will explain my issue better.

    Source issue.JPG

    As you see, the event place is Charleston SC. Going to look at the individual image of the marriage record, it indeed has a heading that indicates it is marriages from St. Phillips Parish in Charleston SC. So why does the title at the top of this screen capture show Maryland Marriages?

    When I do a Record Search asking for Katherine Dunn in Charleston, SC and a marriage in 1746 then I get two hits.

    image.png

    And I get this when clicking the record details icon for the first hit:

    Source1.JPG

    When I click on the record details for the second hit, I get this, which shows it's from South Carolina Marriages 1701-1913):

    Source3.JPG

    So the question is, why does this record show the marriage collection "Maryland, Church Records, 1668-1995" when the marriage was in South Carolina? When I do a record search for the same marriage occurring in Maryland, then I get no hits.

    0
  • SerraNola
    SerraNola mod
    March 26

    @Ann Holladay It's been a while since you posted this, but I wanted to respond. The film where these records are found contains twenty items (sub-collections) with only one of them being marriages of South Carolina. The film needs to be divided so that each item gets to the right collection. Thank you for reporting and helping to improve our records.

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 570 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 999 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups