Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Indexing

Indexing an age over 130

MaxEntropy
MaxEntropy ✭
September 2 edited September 2 in Indexing

Should I put in 130 or leave it blank?

Screenshot 2023-09-02 at 3.56.49 PM.png


0

Best Answer

  • erutherford
    erutherford ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 3 Answer ✓

    Since the max age is 130, mark it blank.

    1

Answers

  • BraydenGraves
    BraydenGraves ✭✭
    September 3

    Are you sure you read this right? I can't read the image myself, but I did a quick google search and it seems that the ability to survive to 130 years is only theoretical. The closest on record is 122 years.

    1
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 3

    No, that's not likely to be the actual age, but yes, that is what it actually says. It's handily underlined in the screenshot: "ciento treinta i siete", which Mr. Google assures me does, indeed, mean 137. (It should apparently correctly be spelled "ciento treinta y siete", but it sounds the same either way.)

    I don't know why the indexing field has a hard limit like this. Do they want us to index what's written or not?

    1
  • BraydenGraves
    BraydenGraves ✭✭
    September 5

    @Julia Szent-Györgyi In all fairness, they probably never expected the limit to be reached for a real index. Maybe it's to keep people from screwing around?

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 27.5K FamilySearch Help
  • 143 Get Involved
  • 2.9K General Questions
  • 475 FamilySearch Center
  • 518 FamilySearch Account
  • 5.2K Family Tree
  • 3.9K Search
  • 5.1K Indexing
  • 725 Memories
  • 375 Other Languages
  • 36 Community News
  • 7.2K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups