Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

Limit Merge results

jbuckaroo
jbuckaroo ✭
May 6 in Suggest an Idea

I'm finding numerous "persons" that have 35, 52, 106 children; from numerous spouses. It appears that people get a little carried away with MERGE. Many of these are merges that - if more carefully vetted - would be marked as "not a match". However, since humans are what humans are, and don't watch the results carefully the result is a real mess. The one I worked on all last week to untangle had 32 children from one wife - a total of seven other wives, with two or three children each. The children were born in a 15 year period in 7 different English locations and in North Carolina. When searching the SOURCES for the children in an attempt to untangle the mess - I found that some of them had christening records which indicate a father of a totally different name - James instead of John and in one case Thomas . One child was born 212 years before the principal person (father). I know there are times we absolutely MUST merge people. I know there is already a message of warning about numerous merges. However, can the computer check to see if the resulting person has more than a standard amount of children. For instance - if the result of a merge would create more than xxx amount of children in a family - post an error and require the operator to explain why? Perhaps require the operator to more closely examine the results?

I'm sure this is an engineering issue.

2
2
Up Down
2 votes

Active · Last Updated May 6

Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 24.6K All Categories
  • 25.7K FamilySearch Help
  • 130 Get Involved
  • 2.8K General Questions
  • 457 FamilySearch Center
  • 482 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.8K Family Tree
  • 3.7K Search
  • 4.9K Indexing
  • 683 Memories
  • 338 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.9K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups