Two images that belong together
I am reviewing these images: South Africa, Johannesburg—Cemetery Records, 1840–2019[M3L2-JJ8] One is marked "extractable data" the other is marked as non-extractable" I have done several of these kinds of images, and they never seem to belong together, but these two do. I can see that the data "usual residence" on the first image matches up with the same on the second image. Should they have been batched as one image? If not, are they marked correctly and I view the second image as "non-extractable"?
Best Answer
-
in the general instructions we find the following to help us in these situations:
What to Do When Records Span 2 Images or to View Additional Images
- If the first record on an image begins on a previous image, don't index it. The record will be indexed as part of the previous batch. Start indexing at the first complete record.
- If the last record on an image continues to the next image, index the entire record, including what continues to the next image.
In this case as you mentioned the records do go together and you have both pages just on separate images. Image 1 has the name of the deceased and will be indexed for this reason. Image 2 has further information that should be included with the information for image 1.
The first entry for Bridget Walker should include the death day, month and year (18.1.63) found on image 2.
It does seem a bit confusing to mark image 2 as No, NO Extractable Data as you are extracting the death date from that image but from what I have learned that is how it is done.
0
Answers
-
Thank you so much! Very helpful explanation
0