New person page : About & Timeline : Missing relations?
I have noticed that on the new person page's about section and timeline there is a relationship and child born from that relationship completely missing! The previous relationship and child born from it, as well as the relationship after which resulted in marriage and no children, are both there. Why is this? I have found researching families that there are often more than one relationship that produce children whether due to death of one parent, breakup of a relationship etc, so it would make sense to be able to see all children related to the parent in the About section and Timeline instead of some algorithm picking the eldest or random relationship?
Comments
-
Hi,
I'm Lyle Toronto, (A FamilySearch Quality Assurance Engineer)
I believe there is a bug showing some of these relationship events in the timeline. We have one example submitted in the bug report. It would be helpful if we had more examples. I have not been able to reproduce the issue with newly created fake data, so this issue is more complex than is first appears.
0 -
Where would I be able to report the bug? What information would you need?
Thanks :)
0 -
@Carrie-Ann Bidzinski You have reported the bug here, and a QA Engineer has responded. Lyle is asking for additional examples if anyone has some to add.
Specific examples are important - the PID would be a good start.
1 -
Ah ok :) PID....is that the person's identification number? If it is then the ones I've found so far I'm having issue with are : L2YF-YVS, L2YN-3B4 and also L21V-D6N (I just noticed the second and third ones), I will keep adding any more I find :)
1 -
Thank you for the examples
Just to note, each example (including the original) has been for living people. This probably accounts for the complexity of duplicating the issue and may point to the source of the issue.
0 -
They seem to be the only three I have found so far, others that are living and in the same circumstances are fine so I am wondering if the bug has occurred due to them all being linked to the same person maybe?
1
