Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

Single field name search

Peggy Parker Ash
Peggy Parker Ash ✭
May 2 in Suggest an Idea

It has become fairly difficult to do creative name searches in the historical records collections. When I try to just put in an unusual first name and a date it says there is not enough information. This is a problem. I used to be able to do this and not being able to do so limits the ability to find pertinent records. I also find that I get many error messages when I do searches. I am getting so frustrated that I generally give up and jump over to Ancestry. I know so many others that are doing the same thing. Even records I know are there I can't find any more. The filters are just too tight. I love FamilySearch and hate having to do this but I just don't have the time to deal with it. I would appreciate looser filters and search restrictions.

1
1
Up Down
1 votes

New · Last Updated May 2

Comments

  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    May 3 edited May 3

    @Peggy Parker Ash

    Generally, I am able to succeed at the second attempt. If you get an error message - or a direction to input more detail - just refresh the page and you should be able to proceed with the search. However, the problem will not necessarily completely go away. If there are a number of pages of results to scroll through, you might get to around the third or fourth page, then get a further warning to input more detail. Again, just refresh the page and you should be able to continue to the end of the task.

    I undertake this type of search on a regular basis - especially with females who I suspect have married (say between censuses) and therefore for whom I have no last name to input. True, I usually add at least a county of birth, or residence, and a date range, if possible. But I generally get to complete my search without great difficulty - although I might not end up with any positive result (e.g. in actually finding the single "Jane Brown" from the 1851 census, as "Jane ------" in the 1861 census!

    Another area in which FamilySearch appears to now be "discouraging" searches involves the inputting of "wildcards". As with the "no last name" scenario, I often receive an error or "add more detail" message when inputting a name like "Le*vesl*y" (so I can results including Leavesley, Leevesley, Leavesly, etc.).

    0
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    May 3 edited May 3

    Here is an example where I have just substituted one letter with a wildcard symbol - let alone leaving the whole field blank.

    The first screenshot was taken after the initial clicking on "Search", the second after all I did was to reload the page. Hey presto, I didn't have to do anything (apart from the page refresh) in spite of the message:

    Try your search again 1.png


    Try your search again 2.png


    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 22.4K All Categories
  • 338 1950 US Census
  • 45.8K FamilySearch Help
  • 86 Get Involved
  • 2.3K General Questions
  • 323 Family History Centers
  • 317 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.1K Family Tree
  • 2.5K Search
  • 3.6K Indexing
  • 425 Memories
  • 4.2K Temple
  • 249 Other Languages
  • 28 Community News
  • 5.3K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups