Allow the "shared with temple" reservations that are re-reserved by someone to be shared
I have just created a Shared Family Group and am adding new family members regularly. With my research I have "pulled" from the "shared with temple" many families that NEED ordinances. I was disappointed to find out that I am NOT ABLE to share them again with our shared family group who are anxious to help do ordinances. I would think that someone who is happy to help complete those ordinances should be allowed to reshare with families active in temple work.
Thank you for listening! .
Comments
-
Cynthia
I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...
[ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]
GREAT suggested enhancement.
Just in passing ...
You are not alone ...
Like MANY, I, believe; and, suggest, that Work, that has been "Share[d] with the Temple System", SHOULD be allowed/able, to be "Shared", with a "Family Group", in fact MULTIPLE "Family Groups".
They COULD work, in tandem; and, we would actually have ... the BEST of BOTH worlds ...
[ ie. The "Temple System"; and, a "Family Group" (or, "Family Groups") ... ]
IF, such was the case; THEN, I would humbly venture to suggest, that It is more likely, that the Work WOULD actually get done FASTER ...
Hey; but, that is just me ...
As an aside ...
Even if, the Work, that was already "Share[d] with the Temple System", WAS actually "Shared", with a "Family Group"; or, even, MULTIPLE "Family Groups", then that work would STILL be subject to the "Constraints" of Work that is "Share[d] with the Temple System" - ie. Subject to a "Temporary" x90 Day "Reservation".
The ONLY difference being, is where, the "Reservation" EXPIES; then that would NOT only revert back to the "Temple System"; but; ALSO to the "Family Group"; or, even, MULTIPLE "Family Groups".
And, we would STILL have the ... the BEST of BOTH worlds ...
I just DO NOT understand, the "Reluctance" of such, on the part of, the "Temple Committee"; and, the "Temple Department" (and, of course, 'FamilySearch'; EXCEPT, that a LOT MORE "Coding", to the "Programme", would certainly be required).
We can but live in hope.
Just my thoughts.
I know, that this certainly does not help/assist; but, I just want to let you know, that you are not alone.
Brett
0
