Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Suggest an Idea

Allow the "shared with temple" reservations that are re-reserved by someone to be shared

Cynthia Snow Banner
Cynthia Snow Banner ✭
March 19 in Suggest an Idea

I have just created a Shared Family Group and am adding new family members regularly. With my research I have "pulled" from the "shared with temple" many families that NEED ordinances. I was disappointed to find out that I am NOT ABLE to share them again with our shared family group who are anxious to help do ordinances. I would think that someone who is happy to help complete those ordinances should be allowed to reshare with families active in temple work.


Thank you for listening! .

2
2
Up Down
2 votes

New · Last Updated March 19

Comments

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    March 20

    @Cynthia Snow Banner

    Cynthia

    I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

    [ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]

    GREAT suggested enhancement.

    Just in passing ...

    You are not alone ...

    Like MANY, I, believe; and, suggest, that Work, that has been "Share[d] with the Temple System", SHOULD be allowed/able, to be "Shared", with a "Family Group", in fact MULTIPLE "Family Groups".

    They COULD work, in tandem; and, we would actually have ... the BEST of BOTH worlds ...

    [ ie. The "Temple System"; and, a "Family Group" (or, "Family Groups") ... ]

    IF, such was the case; THEN, I would humbly venture to suggest, that It is more likely, that the Work WOULD actually get done FASTER ...

    Hey; but, that is just me ...

    As an aside ...

    Even if, the Work, that was already "Share[d] with the Temple System", WAS actually "Shared", with a "Family Group"; or, even, MULTIPLE "Family Groups", then that work would STILL be subject to the "Constraints" of Work that is "Share[d] with the Temple System" - ie. Subject to a "Temporary" x90 Day "Reservation".

    The ONLY difference being, is where, the "Reservation" EXPIES; then that would NOT only revert back to the "Temple System"; but; ALSO to the "Family Group"; or, even, MULTIPLE "Family Groups".

    And, we would STILL have the ... the BEST of BOTH worlds ...

    I just DO NOT understand, the "Reluctance" of such, on the part of, the "Temple Committee"; and, the "Temple Department" (and, of course, 'FamilySearch'; EXCEPT, that a LOT MORE "Coding", to the "Programme", would certainly be required).

    We can but live in hope.

    Just my thoughts.

    I know, that this certainly does not help/assist; but, I just want to let you know, that you are not alone.

    Brett

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 22.6K All Categories
  • 346 1950 US Census
  • 45.9K FamilySearch Help
  • 90 Get Involved
  • 2.3K General Questions
  • 326 Family History Centers
  • 322 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.1K Family Tree
  • 2.5K Search
  • 3.6K Indexing
  • 427 Memories
  • 4.2K Temple
  • 249 Other Languages
  • 28 Community News
  • 5.3K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups