South Africa, Johannesburg—Cemetery Records, 1840–2019[M32Y-7LL]
Answers
-
So nothing jumps out at me in the project instructions or the field help guides as to what to do in this situation. However, because the "undertaker/stonemaker" names are on here after the dates, I would say these dates need to be put in the "burial date" fields.
In the field help it states this : If there is only 1 date with the "D.O.B." abbreviation, index it as the burial date.
I know it says DOB and on this particular batch there is no indication or abbreviations to show what date this is, but I would say this may show Burial Date takes priority? Since we aren't sure the exact death date and I assume guessing the death date is a bad idea as opposed to guessing the burial date.
I edit to add, these situations always frustrate me especially in reviewing. I love having direct directions about EVERYTHING that we may see while indexing/reviewing. I realize with all of the different records taking place for a long period of time, it almost impossible to show examples for everything. I wish it were possible though.
1 -
@Ksalers Thank you. I thought the same initially and after looking for examples and finding none I decided to ask for another opinion. I did see where a few of the graves were to be reopened so I took that as a clue that the dates might be for burial. I shall go forth, review, and correct. Thank you again.
1 -
The image in you batch is a cemetery registration- The project instruction: what to index image # 2- no quite the same image but it is also a cemetery registration and it indicates that date on the first column should be indexed as a Burial date and not as a death, or record dates.
Hope this helps answer your question.
0 -
Also please put South Africa after the cemetery name as the automatic name resolution program frequently resolves South African Place Names to weird places across the globe.
0 -
Thank you so much.
0