Civil Registry - Italy, Rovigo, Ceneselli - 1887
Good afternoon,
From Rovigo's birth records, Ceneselli has almost every year: 1880, 1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, ____, 1888, 1889, 1890. I found it very unusual not to have the year 1887, is there some other possibility of not having this year in addition to those already mentioned: copyright or loss of records.
The issue is also that it doesn't even have the year line, for example the year but the microfilm is missing.😥
Answers
-
@BryanNascimento2 Would you please provide us with more details? The URL of the page that shows the gap would really be useful.
In the catalog entry: https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/1497242?availability=Family%20History%20Library I see Allegati (nati, matrimoni, morti), 1887 as being on DGS 5117399. So, if you are not using the catalog, you might give that a try.
0 -
Hi, thanks for the comment.
The "Allegati" are attachments to the records, not the records. At that same url: https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/1497242?availability=Family%20History%20Library
there is no record of births for 1887, "Nati, 1887". So it's strange to have the attachments but not the birth register for the year 1887.
0 -
@BryanNascimento2 Thanks for the explanation. Those births are oddly grouped, some single years and then some seemingly random combinations. We don't have any inside information as to why 1887 never got captured. Could have been missed by the film crew; could have been missing in the archive. You might want to visit some other sites that have Italian records to see if you can find the info there. Based on what I'm seeing in the wiki article, Antenati looks like a good option. Here's a link to the article. Scroll down to the "Online Records" section:
0
