Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Get Involved/Indexing

Incorrect indexing

Lee Barrow
Lee Barrow ✭
December 17, 2021 edited August 19, 2024 in Get Involved/Indexing

I have been doing research in the U. S. Virgin Islands, and find that numerous records have misidentifed the location as "Virgin Islands, Manistee, Michigan, United States" (see attached). The record clearly states that it is the caribbean island. This seems to be most common in the census records. How can this be corrected?

Screen Shot 2021-12-17 at 12.00.46 PM.png


1

Answers

  • David S Clark
    David S Clark ✭
    December 17, 2021

    I found a record that seems to match that at https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:SP8P-XFK. However, it appears that the place was updated in Dec 2020. Now it shows as Virgin Islands.

    Perhaps your image was created before then. If it was created more recently, perhaps it comes from a different but similar record. If so, please provide the URL of that record.

    0
  • Lee Barrow
    Lee Barrow ✭
    December 17, 2021 edited December 17, 2021

    It is when you do a search. Here is the url:

    https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.givenName=Elziere&q.surname=Titzek

    And the screen shot:

    7D0F37F1-2652-4ABB-833C-D1946AA24E9C.png

    I have seen many similar mistakes with other names

    0
  • Melissa S Himes
    Melissa S Himes ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 18, 2021

    It isn't unique to the Virgin Islands. I'll bet from reading posts that there are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of place names that are screwed up on FamilySearch. I have never seen an explanation for why it happens or if they are working to correct it. @Paul W is most familiar with this situation. I'm sure he will be around soon and can offer insight.

    2
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 18, 2021 edited December 18, 2021

    Thank you for that, Melissa - I recently gave a similar vote of confidence in Gordon Collett's abilities to address a problem!

    Actually, there are others (including Gordon) who have better theories on this subject than I. But it seems each time there is a project to improve the situation in producing correct standardised names, the opposite seems to take place. There has been a volunteer project that, I believe, was fairly counterproductive and a "computer-generated" one (if that's the expression) that turned perfectly correct standardised names (in indexed records) into locations on the other side of the world from the place the event actually took place.

    I think I read that the FamilySearch engineers (connected to place-names projects) were taking a long, hard look before deciding their next move in trying to address these problems. The intentions appear to be worthy, but getting any project (human or machine) to work effectively appears to be another matter!

    Sorry about my terminology and if I have not answered this too well, but it's close to my bedtime (here in the UK), so hopefully others might add their opinions before I return to Community tomorrow. But, in summary, these problems are ongoing, can occur due to different actions / reasons, and (lastly) there is currently no real answer as to when, how (or if) these problems will ever be individually or collectively addressed.

    3
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 18, 2021

    This thread may be helpful. https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/comment/391065#Comment_391065

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 645 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 478 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups