Separating Three Merged Men and Their Families
I am attempting to separate three men that have been merged together: [1] Thomas (c. 1736) and Amy Kyme from Skirbeck Lincolnshire, [2] Thomas (christened 1742) and Ann Kime from Theddlethorpe Lincolnshire, and [3] Thomas (christened 1742) and Osney Kime from Trusthorpe Lincolnshire along with their families who are all muddled together.
RESOLVED
I must say what is really, really, really disturbing is when I go to merge, only names and dates show. Why don't places show when merging??
Best Answer
Answers
-
Could you share a screenshot of a merge where you see only dates, no places? Or the PID of a profile with a pending merge where you see no places?
0 -
I guess I have been merging a lot of people lately where the main person has no info, but the children do and I was expecting to see places after the children, which gives me a little bit of security through the process that I am putting the correct family together. It's been quite disconcerting to see no places.
0 -
My suggestion would be to defer merges until after you do some work on the children's pages, adding and standardizing dates and places.
1 -
@Kughes , Like you, I've found that in most cases the merge screen doesn't present enough information to decide whether two people really need to be merged. Instead, I review the person pages of each potential duplicate carefully. (I also look at the change log to see if there are any bad merges or other issues, and I clean them up first.) I only start the merge after I'm satisfied that the two records really do represent the same person.
In case it's helpful, I've taught a couple of webinars on duplicates and merging. Here are the links:
I hope that helps! Please let us know if you have additional questions.
Kathryn
0