Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Search

Classic transcription error "Wdw" (widow) on census transcribed as "William"

nolakl
nolakl ✭
December 12, 2021 edited December 12, 2021 in Search

Where do I report a volunteer's transcription error on censuses? It is causing the deceased to appear as living at the census date. "Wdw Zephirin Folse, female." The widow of an ancestor who died circa 1837 is recorded correctly on 1840, 1850, and 1860 censuses and slave schedules as the head of household. The census taker entered her name as the widow of her husband, writing "Wdw" before her husband's name ("Wdw Zephirin Folse"), and recorded female for the sex. All of this is fine. Fast forward 180 years to the problem: A volunteer transcribed this census info incorrectly. They assumed "Wdw" was an abbreviation for William and entered the name of the person as William Zephirin Folse. Family trees all over the internet have Zephirin Folse listed as still alive in 1840, 1850, and 1860 because of this. But he was deceased and his strong and capable widow was taking care of the family business and affairs. Can we please correct this and give her the credit and return him back to the grave?

0

Best Answer

  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    December 15, 2021 edited December 15, 2021 Answer ✓

    The only instance of anything like this transcription error that I can get FamilySearch to cough up is the 1860 slave schedule's index, which is not editable; it says "Wm Zephinn Folse". The 1860 and 1850 census indexes have both already been corrected: "Widow Zepherin Folse" and "Widow Ziphirin Folse". I cannot find her in 1840. (Nobody else can, either, as far as I can tell.)

    None of the records I found are attached to FamilySearch's Family Tree. (Is this him? https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/details/M5PP-LNK) Perhaps attaching all of the sources and making sure the FamilySearch tree is as fully correct as possible will help the correct information to propagate to all of the other online trees. Make sure to include the 1860 slave schedule among Maria Eugenie's sources, with a note about the correction in either the citation's "reason to attach" box or its Notes field (or both).

    (It looks like he's correct on WikiTree: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Folse-303, although Marie Eugenie is missing the 1860 census. Adding it there, too, with a note about the incorrect index on the slave schedule, may help reduce the incidence of incorrect death dates for Zephirin.)

    0

Answers

  • Sam Sulser
    Sam Sulser Community Manager
    December 14, 2021

    Can you please provide the URL (web address) where you see the record?

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30.1K All Categories
  • 24.2K FamilySearch Help
  • 125 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 639 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 322 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups