You need to establish a specific forum for reviewers to report exceptionally bad indexing. If we report them in normal "questions", there's no guarantee the right people will see it.
So here are two really bad batches that someone in authority should look at:
1 - Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZZ-K2V]
The only thing the indexer did right was label the records as marriages. Otherwise, they put 6 records in instead of 4. They put random numbers in for page and records. Everything else was blanked. Pitiful attempt to look like they were doing something.
2 - Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZF-TWV]
The only thing this indexer did right was put 5 records in. However, they designated them all as baptisms (They are deaths) and blanked everything else. Maliciously lazy?