Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZF-BFG].
Possible malicious indexing. Patron reports, "Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZF-BFG]. The batch has 6 death records. Indexer put one record in as a baptism, with only a bogus page number and all blanks." I was unable to open and verify.
Answers
-
It sounds more like the person downloaded a batch and didn't understand the records so they submitted it rather than returning it. Or if the patron is indexing, it might have been a batch returned for reindexing. I doubt a person would submit 1 record as a malicious batch.
1 -
Hello Norma,
Here is a knowledge article of knowledge that can help you to know in this case:
On rare occasions, you may find a review batch that has many records that still need to be indexed. A few examples where you might see this are listed below:
- The indexer only indexed a couple of records out of many on the image or marked many blank that should not be.
- The indexer marked an image as having no extractable data, but the image has many records to index.
- None of the information that the indexer entered matches the information on the image.
When something like this happens, you should send the batch back for re-indexing or index it yourself and resubmit it. Note that sending a batch for re-indexing should not be a common occurrence. If you see a lot of batches that need to be re-indexed in the same project, contact FamilySearch to report the issue.
If you put time into a batch before you realize that there will need to be significant additions, you can finish the batch and submit it. Your changes will not be preserved if you return the batch for re-indexing.
Hope this answer your question.
0
