Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Indexing

Middlesex, England surname help please

Pamela Hill7
Pamela Hill7 ✭✭
September 24, 2021 in Indexing

Hi - I wonder if anyone could help me with entry 41, 28 September, Isabell wife of Rich S*aker

I am struggling with the surname

Thank you, Pamela

https://www.familysearch.org/indexing/batch/48611e70-e0c5-4188-870b-5e2f6670021d

0

Answers

  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 24, 2021 edited September 24, 2021

    @Pamela Hill7

    The marriage of this couple has already been indexed - see https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:V526-2XD. As you can see, the surname has been indexed for this event as STAUESAKER.

    I found this by being convinced the surname did end in "...saker" and performing a search for "Richard *saker" in Middlesex. In brief, further searches I could find no similar surnames, so maybe it is an incorrectly spelled name of German, or unknown origin.

    Update - take a look at https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.surname=s*saker&q.surname.exact=on&q.anyPlace=middlesex&q.anyPlace.exact=on&count=20&offset=0&m.defaultFacets=on&m.queryRequireDefault=on&m.facetNestCollectionInCategory=on and you will see what appear to be other variants of this name.

    0
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 24, 2021 edited September 24, 2021

    Screenshot of results page reference above:

    Stauesaker.png

    See also https://douggoesglobaldotcom.wordpress.com/2016/04/10/a-sunny-sunday-on-the-danube/ - although I only found one other reference (in German) to what appeared to be a River Stausaker.

    0
  • DHilary2
    DHilary2 ✭✭✭
    September 24, 2021

    Hello,

    I agree that the name looks like "Stauesaker" but, as in the old style of writing "u" and "v" were interchangeable, I would suggest that Stavesaker is more likely. There are records of Stavesakers in Middlesex in to 1660s on My Heritage.

    I hope this helps,

    Hilary.

    0
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 24, 2021 edited September 24, 2021

    This is another image, linked to two of the instances of an individual indexed as "Phillip Stawsaker". but (from the original) I think I would have indexed as "Phillip Stauesaker" - mainly because the letter "w" looks rather different elsewhere on this page, so "ue" seems a better alternative.


    Stauesaker2.png


    0
  • Melissa S Himes
    Melissa S Himes ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 24, 2021

    I would use a wild-card. 😊

    0
  • Pamela Hill7
    Pamela Hill7 ✭✭
    September 24, 2021

    Thank you everyone. It's good to have second opinions. I think the wild card might be the way to go. I will look for Isabell Morley too, just in case there is a clue there.

    Thanks again

    Pamela

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 29.9K All Categories
  • 24.1K FamilySearch Help
  • 122 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 634 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups