UK, England, Lancashire—Nonconformist Church Records, 1647–1996 [Part B] "restored" people
UK, England, Lancashire—Nonconformist Church Records, 1647–1996 [Part B][MSK7-JB8]
I am reviewing this batch and have a few questions:
1. Should most of these be indexed as baptisms?
If so, what to do with individuals who are "restored" - No. 258, 262, 263, 264
The indexer has left them out entirely but I think they should be in based on this instruction
When indexing baptism records, if a date was recorded but not identified, index it as the baptism date....
I don't know what "restored" means and does the date indicate the date they were restored or something else
2. There are a few individuals where a death date is provided as well eg No. 261 and the indexer has created 2 entries for them, one a baptism and the other a burial.
I think this is right but just want to check I am correct.