addition to standardized places
Livermore, McLean, Kentucky, United States needs to be added as a standardized place option.
Comments
-
FYI
I added a 'Comment', to your previous post, in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, to the effect that ...
That a more appropriate area in the this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, would be a particular 'Group', in the "Groups" Section, in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum; which, I suggest would be "FamilySearch Places".
As such ...
Can I humbly suggest that, you consider REPOSTING / RESUBMITTING this post of yours in the aforementioned 'Group'.
Please be aware that you may need to "Join" that 'Group', to post.
Here is the direct links to the aforementioned 'Group'.
"Groups" Section
Home > Groups > FamilySearch Places
FamilySearch Places
https://community.familysearch.org/en/group/68-familysearch-places
Again, I humbly suggest that the 'Group' of "FamilySearch Places", the "Groups" Section, in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum, would be a more appropriate submit this particular post of yours.
Good Luck.
I hope this may help, somewhat.
Brett
ps: You previous post
"Groups" Section
'Group' = FamilySearch Family Tree
Home > Groups > FamilySearch Family Tree
Standardized location/place
https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/94445/standardized-location-place
.
1 -
I raised a topic today arguing for the winding-up of certain groups, but "Places" is one that certainly needs to be retained - even if the "Groups" section were to disappear completely upon a further revamp of Community.
As Brett suggests, this is the most suitable place (excuse the pun) to add such requests.
0 -
Normally, the correct place to request additional standard place names is yet another site linked from the relevant Edit frame, the 2nd link in blue:
I use that site often. But today the link is bad:
0
