Help with a name on a birth record
Hello,
Could you please clarify this record? I have the father as being Abraham Gurtner and mother is Verena Groenig and I cannot figure out the child's name. 16 October 1682. Left column.
This is from Gurzelen, Bern Record. Thank you so much.
Loretta
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:939L-PK9S-B1?i=277&cc=1640373&cat=772646
답변들
-
I read "Anni".
BTW - I had proposed a structure for discussion titles on https://community.familysearch.org/de/discussion/129680/what-title-would-be-best-for-postings and hope for many opinions: what do you think about this? Alternatively you could just adopt this format in your future postings 😉. In this case the title could have been
Gurzelen - baptism - 1682 - Gurtner - child's name
0 -
Thank you so much for your help. I think your idea is a great one. I will try to remember for next time. SO it would go into Discussions instead of questions correct?
Have a great weekend.
Sincerely,
Loretta
0 -
So it would go into Discussions instead of questions - correct?
In theory - yes 🙂 ... however, I do not have the impression that this differentiation is made here consistently: both types show up in a single table chronologically. Also - I don't see a real difference: most discussions will start with a question.
0 -
Oops!! It really wasn't the moderators. It was the translators/transcribers like Robert Seal. PaulaAnn
0 -
@PABulfinch I didn't blame the moderators 😊. I assume it is the people posting the first contribution as either question or discussion.
However - that doesn't change my impression that it is not handled consistently - whoever makes the decision.
0 -
Oh, that wasn't my intent at all. I was merely saying that other translators like you had me create a list, too. I was actually supporting you and wondering if you would like to see the list. PaulaAnn
0 -
When you mention a list, you don't mean what I have quoted on https://community.familysearch.org/de/discussion/comment/470018/#Comment_470018 - or do you? This wouldn't address the difference between a "question" and a "discussion".
0