Home› Ask a Question› General Questions

LegacyUser: man (or woman) of mistery...

JuanZuluaga3
JuanZuluaga3 ✭✭✭
September 14 edited September 15 in General Questions

😁

I thought that the top community contributor to this site was wonderful Áine — but she is not!

The top one is a Mr or Ms https://community.familysearch.org/en/profile/LegacyUser

This person joined FamilySearch before the Internet! Was he or she using Bitnet or Arpanet?

I hope this is not the same person who has been wrecking havoc on the Guacari volumes I cleaned — please check his or her credential access.

image.png

(Poor https://community.familysearch.org/en/profile/Anonymous was banned…)

image.png 46K
Tagged:
  • Community "username"
  • Username & password
  • Legacy disputes
1

Best Answer

  • Alan E. Brown
    Alan E. Brown mod
    September 14 edited September 14 Answer ✓

    LegacyUser is not an actual person, but rather is a special user account that was created to facilitate the transition from the old GetSatisfaction platform to the current Vanilla platform that powers FamilySearch Community. Because of differences in those platforms, posts and comments made in GetSatisfaction were generally attributed to LegacyUser as they were migrated to Vanilla.

    Edit: This discussion is not visible to most people, so I removed the link; see another example in a later comment. As an example, consider this old discussion, which took place on the GetSatisfaction platform, but was migrated to Vanilla in 2020. You'll see dozens of comments attributed to LegacyUser that were clearly made by at least a dozen distinct people.

    So the contributions attributed to LegacyUser do not represent a single incredibly active person, but rather a conglomeration of the former contributions of a large number of unnamed people. You may also see some post-transition contributions attributed to LegacyUser. This may happen because of administrative actions related to user accounts that are deleted.

    As for the date, the Unix epoch is the timestamp used as the starting point for the digital storage of dates in many systems. It was 1 January 1970, which because of time zone issues is sometimes displayed as the day before: 31 December 1969. When a timestamp is stored as 0, it will generally be displayed as 1969 or 1970. That doesn't really mean the event occurred then, but rather that no date is known, so the value of 0 was stored.

    4

Answers

  • MaureenE123
    MaureenE123 ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 14

    @Alan E. Brown I can't see "this old discussion" referred to above, I get a page which says

    "Permission Problem

    You don't have permission to do that."

    1
  • Alan E. Brown
    Alan E. Brown mod
    September 14 edited September 14

    @MaureenE123 Sorry about that. I unfortunately chose an example in an area that most people can't see. Thanks for letting me know.

    Here's an old discussion converted from GetSatisfactionwith multiple comments by users that are appearing as LegacyUser.

    0
  • Áine.ní.Donnghaile
    Áine.ní.Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 14

    @JuanZuluaga3 🤣

    3
  • JuanZuluaga3
    JuanZuluaga3 ✭✭✭
    September 16 edited September 16

    This was all a silly way to say that Áine.ní.Donnghaile is the real deal!

    💐

    https://community.familysearch.org/en/badge/12

    https://community.familysearch.org/en/badge/13

    image.png
    image.png 36.8K
    2
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 47.8K Ask a Question
  • 7.7K Family Tree
  • 6.3K Search
  • 5.5K General Questions
  • 7K Get Involved
  • 1.2K Memories
  • 343 Other Languages
  • 83 Community News
  • Groups