Home› Ask a Question› Search

How to get an indexing error corrected on a non-editable record?

KE_631
KE_631 ✭
April 26 edited April 26 in Search

Apologies if I'm posting this question in the wrong place—first-time poster here.

This record for the wedding of Gottfried Hierholzer (PZDD-8PP) and his second wife, Maria Magdalena Schaupp or Schupp (PZDD-48R), is from the church books of the diocese of Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany. The indexing lists the place of the event as "Rieden, Amberg-Sulzbach, Oberpfalz, Bayern, Deutschland." However, that location looks incorrect because it is outside the diocese of Augsburg.

I do not have access to see the image, but I found the wedding record on Matricula Online's records for the diocese of Augsburg. I believe it's the same individuals because not only do the names match, but the DOB for Gottfried Hierholzer matches the DOB on the record indexed on FamilySearch. Additionally, Gottfried is listed as a widower on this record, which is consistent with this being his second marriage. The location on the Matricula record is Frieding, not Rieden. As shown on the map at Matricula, this Frieding is just northeast of Herrsching am Ammersee.

The best "standardized location" I can come up with for this Frieding in FamilySearch is "Frieding, Andechs, Starnberg, Bavaria, Germany" although it doesn't fit the 1832 event date.

Is there another place I should report this correction, or is reporting it here sufficient?

0

Answers

  • dancingintherain
    dancingintherain ✭✭✭
    April 27 edited April 28

    @KE_631 I think that you would get better help posting this in the German Records group.

    https://community.familysearch.org/en/group/88-germany-research

    0
  • Áine.ní.Donnghaile
    Áine.ní.Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 27

    @KE_631
    Your question has been moved to the Search category, the best place for your question. The members of the Germany Research group are great when you need help translating a record, but they cannot edit an uneditable record.

    2
  • maryellenstevensbarnes1
    maryellenstevensbarnes1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 27

    @dancingintherain and @Áine.ní.Donnghaile just my opinion but I think this may have to do with the standardization of places - I've seen other discussions but don't have enough skills to explain or fix

    0
  • Áine.ní.Donnghaile
    Áine.ní.Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 27

    @maryellenstevensbarnes1
    I looked at the record before I commented. Usually, with the place standardization issue, there are breadcrumbs - evidence of the change, including the word "original." This record didn't have any of that.

    1
  • maryellenstevensbarnes1
    maryellenstevensbarnes1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    April 28

    @Áine.ní.Donnghaile Thank you, and best wishes — we users all appreciate your willingness & dedication

    0
  • SerraNola
    SerraNola mod
    April 28

    @KE_631

    This record has a duplicate as it is found on two different films—8119700 and 8117929. I noticed they are both attached to Gottfried Hierholzer and both now show the place name as “Frieding, Andechs, Starnberg, Bavaria, Germany”. To be historically correct, “Germany” should be omitted but there is not an option for that in standardized place names.

    1
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 46.6K Ask a Question
  • 7.4K Family Tree
  • 5.9K Search
  • 5.3K General Questions
  • 6.9K Get Involved
  • 1.2K Memories
  • 336 Other Languages
  • 80 Community News
  • Groups