Home› Ask a Question› Search

Two ways to search for people in a location: how do they differ?

JuanZuluaga3
JuanZuluaga3 ✭✭✭
February 15 edited February 15 in Search

Behind the scenes, what is the difference between searching like this

MonederoValleLocation.png

https://www.familysearch.org/en/search/record/results?count=100&q.recordCountry=Colombia&q.recordSubcountry=Colombia%2CValle%20del%20Cauca&q.surname=Monedero

compared to searching like this?

LifeEventValle.png

https://www.familysearch.org/en/search/record/results?count=100&q.anyPlace=Valle%20del%20Cauca%2C%20Colombia&q.surname=Monedero

LifeEventValle.png 25.7K
MonederoValleLocation.png 22.5K
Tagged:
  • Record Searching
  • Find Ancestor by Location
0

Answers

  • Áine.ní.Donnghaile
    Áine.ní.Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 15 edited February 15

    Good morning @JuanZuluaga3

    Your first search is isolated just to collections from Colombia, 5 collections only.

    image.png

    Your second search includes results from over 100 collections, from many different countries. There may be a mention of Colombia in those records.

    image.png

    Your first search should return results more quickly since it is narrower in scope.

    image.png 261.8K
    image.png 106.8K
    3
  • JuanZuluaga3
    JuanZuluaga3 ✭✭✭
    February 16 edited February 16

    Hi @Áine.ní.Donnghaile ,

    "Your first search is isolated just to collections from Colombia, 5 collections only."

    I agree, this is what I would have expected. However, I have seen some strange cases. Please consider this (as I try to find people with a lastname within a specific collection from Ecuador):

    https://www.familysearch.org/en/search/record/results?count=20&q.recordCountry=Ecuador&q.surname=torreglosa&f.collectionId=1923402

    I get 19 records.

    Screenshot from 2026-02-15 19-58-25.png

    However, as I go thru them, I realize that the 1st record, not only got entered wrong location (the Cartagena, Lambayeque, Perú part, a human or bot mistake as we have see often), but belongs to a different collection, from Colombia.

    Screenshot from 2026-02-15 20-04-11.png

    See how record comes from a Colombian collection — that somehow got linked to an Ecuadorian collection.

    Screenshot from 2026-02-15 20-07-58.png

    So, even if the search should be done within a collection, somehow records from other collections get included, even with a high score (and getting to the top of the list).

    Screenshot from 2026-02-15 19-58-25.png 182.8K
    Screenshot from 2026-02-15 20-04-11.png 200.6K
    Screenshot from 2026-02-15 20-07-58.png 571.4K
    0
  • SerraNola
    SerraNola ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 23

    @JuanZuluaga3 This is a known error that has been in the queue. I will see if I can get it corrected. Thanks for bringing it back to our attention!

    2
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 47.8K Ask a Question
  • 7.7K Family Tree
  • 6.3K Search
  • 5.5K General Questions
  • 7K Get Involved
  • 1.2K Memories
  • 343 Other Languages
  • 83 Community News
  • Groups