Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Indexing

An Original historiSource Datecal record was bound out of page order, Can it be reindexd in order?

Ken Huffman
Ken Huffman ✭
July 31, 2021 edited July 31, 2021 in Indexing

The result is that the children are matched to the wrong parents and the Hints come up with incorrect parents.


Source Date

28 December 1882

Source Title (Required)

Perry Weist, "Ohio, County Births, 1841-2003"

Web Page (Link to the Record)Go to the web page

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XDTH-FMG

Where the Record Is Found (Citation)

"Ohio, County Births, 1841-2003", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XDTH-FMG : 8 March 2021), Perry Weist, 1882.

Describe the Record (Notes)

The official source for this record had page 194 moved afet page 195. This caused amismath of children and parents on pp. 193-195. Perry's parents are William H Weist and Miriam Paddock.

Note

Right side of p. 193 was moved to the right side of p. 195 because left side of p. 194 was moved after left side of p.195. The data is reachable but the hints will not correctly connect the data. The pages were indexed in the out-of-order order.


Note: a. The book page #'s are in the upper left corner of each image. 

     b . Each book page number is for both two book pages that are open in the image. 

     c. Each image is two pages of the open book.

     d. Graphically, it's supposed to look like this:

        Image 245        Image 246       Image 247

     193 Left 193 Right  194 Left 194 Right 195 Left 195 Right

      Child    Parents   Child   Parents   Child   Parents

     e. But it's really like this:

         Image 245        Image 246       Image 247

     193 Left 194 Right  195 Left 193 Right  194 Left 195 Right

      Child   Parents    Child   Parents    Child   Parents

Tagged:
  • Indexing
  • Document
  • historical records
  • Incorrect child parent relationship
0

Answers

  • Jessicarm1
    Jessicarm1 ✭
    July 31, 2021 edited July 31, 2021

    I don't think it can be re-indexed, since this is the presentation of the photos. I think the best that can be done is corrections to the individual records, with a note left to give the reason for the very different data.

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 29.9K All Categories
  • 24.1K FamilySearch Help
  • 122 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.6K Indexing
  • 634 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups