Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Family Tree

US1910Project

URWelcome
URWelcome ✭✭✭
June 29, 2021 edited July 18, 2024 in Family Tree

This example shows that the father was originally created on January 15, 2017, then he, wife, 2nd daughter and son were created June 24, 2021 AFTER the US1910Project duplicate family. Even though the family was mostly created AFTER the US1910Project, the database didn't find a duplicate for the wife, husband or 2nd daughter on June 24, 2021.


US1910Project duplicate family created April 15, 2021:


Willy Wilson   GCRT-FBV father

Lula Wilson GCRT-WKP mother

Grace Wilson GCRT-L47 daughter

Mable Wilson   GCRT-GZL daughter


Existing family in family search created January 15, 2017:

William H. Wilson 27 July 1883 – 24 March 1962   • LR8Q-FP5​​ created January 15, 2017 (merged with GZLT-N2D created June 24, 2021)

Lula Ryan 10 June 1890 – 11 February 1950 • GZLT-F94 created June 24, 2021

Mable Clara Wilson 21 September 1908 – 5 April 1980   • GZLT-N3L created June 24, 2021

Elmer James Wilson Sr 30 January 1911 – 4 November 1968 • GZLT-4LJ​​ created June 24, 2021


I found another duplicate for the first daughter, Grace Wilson


US1910Project duplicate created April 15, 2021:

Grace Wilson GCRT-L47 daughter

Grace L. Wilson LBG3-V37 originally created May 6, 2018 (with another sent of parents)

as a wife to George J. Johnson LBG3-V37


FYI - these records have been combined

Tagged:
  • Project creates duplicates
3

Answers

  • Gordon Collett
    Gordon Collett ✭✭✭✭✭
    June 29, 2021 edited June 29, 2021

    The Possible Duplicates routine is very strict in the hopes of showing only possible duplicates that are as close to certainly being real duplicates as possible. Recently it was made even stricter because too many people just go ahead and merge any possible duplicates presented without evaluating whether they are real duplicates or not, leading to a bunch of incorrect merges.

    This stricter limitation on possible duplicates means there will be tons of duplicates that need to found by us users and be carefully evaluated by people such as yourself before combining them, as you did for this family. This is a good thing. Keep up the great work!

    (P.S: I though your post was just about the possible duplicates missing people. Then I found your post under Ideas. It does sound very concerning that the 1910 census project, which sounds more like an indexing project, is putting everyone into Family Tree. That's going to create a huge number of new duplicates.)

    2
  • URWelcome
    URWelcome ✭✭✭
    June 29, 2021

    This is even a better reason to discontinue this PROJECT!

    "Recently it was made even stricter because too many people just go ahead and merge any possible duplicates presented without evaluating whether they are real duplicates or not, leading to a bunch of incorrect merges."

    1
  • 1ByrdLady
    1ByrdLady ✭✭✭
    June 30, 2021 edited June 30, 2021

    This is not a spam message. Patron is complaining about multiple duplicates from one person. Unabletodisplay is reporting abuse by US1910Project

    1
  • URWelcome
    URWelcome ✭✭✭
    June 30, 2021
    https://community.familysearch.org/en/discussion/88103/us1910project

    When adding the 4th child, he was an existing record in family search with ANOTHER set of parents:

    William Wilson • GH1D-RDF

    Lula Beverly • GH1D-YKM

    There is no way the matching software will find these duplicates. Please stop creating even more duplicates with the US1910Project!

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 644 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 476 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups