Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› General Questions

As a reviewer of marriage certificates, I see a number of indexer enter the surname of the groom in

Dave C Smith
Dave C Smith ✭
February 13, 2021 edited February 14, 2021 in General Questions

It is interesting that there is a maiden name box in the groom's information area. When I Googled the meaning of a maiden name almost all entries refer to it as pertaining to the bride but in some places is refers to it as a birth name for men or women. Should a maiden name for the groom be entered?

I never questioned what to do until I came across a project of marriage certificates that specifically listed the birth name of both the groom and the bride. Before, the forms only listed the surname.

0

Answers

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 13, 2021

    @Dave C Smith​ 

    Dave

    Due to the nature of your 'Question' ...

    I am "Tagging" this (General) 'Question' of yours, to the 'Group' being "Indexing Chat", in this "Community.FamilySearch" Forum; so that, the members of that group can answer/assist you or give you some perspective.

    Brett 

    @Indexing Chat​ 

    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    February 13, 2021

    This morning I started indexing some Wisconsin marriage records from 2005 - 2015, and I saw in the project instructions the example of how to index the record showed that both the groom and the brides maiden name fields typed in from the birth surname field. That is different from other Wisconsin marriage projects I've done from earlier years.

    0
  • LegacyUser
    LegacyUser ✭✭✭✭
    February 13, 2021

    Thank you. I continue to learn how to more accurately index. Good grief! When I think of all the things I have done wrong and the progress I have made I only hope that partially accurate indexing is better than none at all.

    0
  • Adrian Bruce1
    Adrian Bruce1 ✭✭✭
    February 14, 2021

    Why does FamilySearch persist in misusing language? This is similar to indexing Executors in probate documents as Beneficiaries.

    ​

    The phrase "maiden name" surely can only apply to females. Maiden???

    ​

    Secondly, in the UK at least, it does not mean birth name ​- it means the name immediately prior to first marriage. (Mind you, how many people realize that is debatable)

    ​

    So why not index the Birth name on these certificates as Birth Name?​ Instead of something that is wrong twice over for males, and wrong once over for females?

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30K All Categories
  • 24.2K FamilySearch Help
  • 123 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 637 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups