In Netherlands, Noord-Holland, Civil Registration, 1739-1951 indexes are swapped

gjt47

Records indexed as Watergraafsmeer are actually records of Weesp and vice versa.

SerraNola

@gjt47 To clarify for other users, neither of these records are indexed so a better description of the problem would be to say the "images are swapped". When following the waypoints (breadcrumbs) to each of these sets of records—yup, it's a nuisance to be led to the wrong set of records. However, currently waypoints are not being updated as we are moving towards using the Catalog and/or Images to access unindexed records. The records for Watergraafsmeer and Weesp are found on the same film and are correct in the Catalog and in Images:

Catalog collection for Watergraafsmeer

Catalog collection for Weesp

Image results for DGS 4733241

Hope, that's clear and sorry for the inconvenience.

Áine Ní Donnghaile

@gjt47 Could you supply an example or URLs?

gjt47

Indexed as location Weesp, but film has birth records of location Watergraafsmeer:

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-18SJ-C4?cc=2020117&wc=Q643-BF6:341491201,341688201&lang=en&i=0

gjt47

And in the other direction:

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-16NM-P?wc=Q643-1RJ:341644001,341419101&cc=2020117&lang=en&i=0&cc=2020117