Indexing is out of sync with the images in the 1910 population census schedules - California

FLQR

1910 population census schedules - California: California. National Population Census 1910

1. #004970248

[The above is the header where I first entered.]

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRVW-QKP?view=index&cc=1727033&lang=en&groupId=

Image 1201 of 1478 has the first name indexed Alice M Anderson

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MV27-4LG?lang=en .(also Image 41 of 68)

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRVW-QKP

United States, Census, 1910›California›Alameda›Oakland Ward 5›ED 120 (68 images) [This was the header when I checked if a shorter url (truncating after the "?" mark) returned the expected page, it did for the image, but is a subset with a different header.

The associated Image is at image 1203 of 1478; also 43 of 68

The 2-page offset continues forward. At Image 1212 "This image has not been indexed." BUT the names are listed with image 1210.

The names indexed with image 1211 are shown on image 1213

Image 1212 is void of names, but has names indexed.

Images 1222, 1226, states "This image has not been indexed."

The offset error continues past image 1231 (I stepped through the images).

The people on Image 1250, are on the index associated with image 1248. (Spot Check)

Images 1260, 1270, 1279, 1300 are correctly alligned with their index.

Checking the smaller set, from image 41 of 68

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRVW-QKP?lang=en&i=40&cc=1727033

Image 21 index begins with Dexters, who are on the image 23 of 68,

Image 1 index has the people shown on image 3 of 68,

So similar errors.

Thank you.

MandyShaw1

@SerraNola can you help please

ShelleWells

@FLQR and @MandyShaw1 we are reviewing this and will make sure it is reported to the proper department. Thank you for making us aware.