Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Get Involved/Indexing

Getting back to indexing

HammerLouise1
HammerLouise1 ✭
January 25 edited April 22 in Get Involved/Indexing

I doing a city directory and the last indexing project I worked on was a census record. I have this batch, but the first 9 entries were filled out. The names are just the main ones, ie, Finnell John, Finnerty Johanna, Finni Charles, etc. I'm thinking this is an error on whoever started this batch? Shouldn't all the names have their own entry? Unless they are a business or duplicated, of course.

indexing.JPG
0

Best Answer

  • erutherford
    erutherford ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 25 edited January 25 Answer ✓

    Yes, this is an error. The indexer did every unique surname. Every person will have their own entry—Stephen L. Finnell and so forth—unless they are exact duplicates; ie you have 15 John Smiths, you will index the first John Smith, then skip down to the next unique name, like John A. Smith.

    1

Answers

  • HammerLouise1
    HammerLouise1 ✭
    January 25

    Thank you, that's what I thought.

    0
  • Walter9778
    Walter9778 ✭
    January 25

    Gracias, estan haciendo un trabajo muy valioso.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 570 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 998 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups