Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Search

Why are places shown in some UK Census records so badly wrong ?

Options
  • Mute
Re Searching
Re Searching ✭✭✭✭
September 19, 2024 edited February 5 in Search

Can somebody please explain the mechanism that translates a record sourced by a 3rd party, such as FMP, and then presents it as data in FS. I am begininng to wonder whether the source data is actually correct, but it is being altered as the record is incorporated into FS or it is correct in both but is being altered before it is presented.

Example:

Address as shown in actual census record : "11, Nelson St., Kingston upon Hull, Yorkshire, England"

Place name shown in FS record : "Holy Trinity King's Square, York, Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom"

Source record: https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KZL1-YPG

I think that the parish name is being used to mess up the place. The parish is shown as "Hull Trinity St Mary", and this is non-standard, so I think that the automatic place name standardization routine is using a best guess and altering the data to become Holy Trinity York.

What I'd like to know is whether this is done on-the-fly and thus is able to be corrected by a change, or whether it was done when the collection data was imported, in which case, it's now like concrete: thoroughly mixed up and set.

1

Answers

  • MandyShaw1
    MandyShaw1 ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 19, 2024 edited September 19, 2024

    I've always previously found, when investigating such matters, that the underlying data as obtainable via the FS Records API is fine and that the 'disappearing census information' grief happens only when presenting the information on the screen.

    However on this occasion these lines

    Full address Nelson Street, Holy Trinity, Hull, Yorkshire & Yorkshire (East Riding), England

    Street Nelson Street

    appear on the FMP transcript but are not reflected in the underlying FS data (or, anyway, not in the JSON version of it that I can see). (NB the FMP transcript doesn't show that it's specifically number 11 Nelson St.)

    @Ashlee C. can you raise this with the relevant team please?

    2
  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 19, 2024 edited September 19, 2024

    As indexed on FMP

    Title

    Jr

    First name(s)

    David

    Last name

    Lightowler

    Sex

    Male

    Relationship

    Son

    Birth year

    1850

    Age

    21

    Census year

    1871

    Birth town

    Bradford

    Birth county

    Yorkshire

    Birth county as transcribed

    YORKSHIRE

    Birth country

    England

    Birth place

    Bradford Yorkshire England

    Marital status

    -

    Occupation

    Hotel keeper

    Full address

    Nelson Street, Holy Trinity, Hull, Yorkshire & Yorkshire (East Riding), England

    Street

    Nelson Street

    Parish

    Holy Trinity

    City

    Kingston upon Hull

    County

    Yorkshire, Yorkshire (East Riding)

    Country

    England

    Registration district

    Hull

    Sub-district

    Humber

    Enumeration district

    1

    Parliamentary borough or division

    Kingston upon Hull

    Municipal borough or ward

    Humber

    Archive series

    RG10

    Piece number

    4786

    Folio

    4

    Page

    4

    Schedule

    8

    Record set

    1871 England, Wales & Scotland Census

    Category

    Census, land & surveys

    Subcategory

    Census

    Collections from

    Great Britain, England

    @Re Searching if you are in the PQS group, you'll see a recent thread where I asked about the placename algorithm and the mangled indexing of an Alabama, USA, death record. The place of death had been changed multiple times from a place that was standard and correct into an absolute mess.

    I'm hopeful that the PQS will shed light on the placename issue and that visibility will lead to eventual correction.

    2
  • Paul W
    Paul W ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 19, 2024

    There has been a general problem in establishing where the fault lies when census records are passed across from FMP to FamilySearch. In the past, one has blamed the other for what ends up (or doesn't) on the FS database. I have noticed a particular problem when I have been adding these census sources lately, via the new source linker. I have added a lot that relate to a Yorkshire residence and the format of the place names has been quite awful. The county name has been repeated ("Yorkshire, Yorkshire") and there have been other weird appearances, which at least we are now able to standardize with the facility of the NSL, before moving across to the respective profiles.

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43.3K Ask a Question
  • 3.5K General Questions
  • 577 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 652 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.6K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 480 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups