When adding members to the FamilySearch.org Family Tree, why can only add spouses to a member?
Quite often historical (male) figures had multiple wives and children by each wife.
Sometimes they had additional children from sexual liaison with (insert descriptive term here) and there is noway to represent this relationship and the child gets assigned to the next wife.
In years to come there are going to be hundreds, if not thousands or tens of thousands of G('s) grandchildren that are going to not be able to trace their ancestors because they have a ancestor who conceived with donor sperm and the records may not be available to establish the (e.g.) actual father.
It seems to me that something that happened 400 years ago should not still considered as a sensitive matter, especially when the these are historical figures such as kings and queens, dukes, lords, etc and sometimes the child when on to become an important historical person themselves.