How I can propose a correction in a collection place name?
Hi, I found an error in the place for the image group number 004571595
https://www.familysearch.org/records/images/search-results?imageGroupNumbers=004571595
Santa Lucia, San Pedro, Buenos Aires, Argentina is a small rural town with low population even today. Because of the quantity of records per year and the addresses on them, I think the collection is for the Parroquia Santa Lucia in Palermo, Buenos Aires City, Argentina
I have being using familysearch for a long time, but I don't know what is the procedure to change the collection place. Where I can find some guidelines?
Thanks
Answers
-
The Title Board on those images refers to Paroquia de Santa Lucia Buenos Aires.
You can report an error in the Title in the Catalog by email to books@familysearch.org
0 -
Ubiquitous errors like this are the main reason I avoid the Images section like the plague. It only ever serves to raise my blood pressure.
Use the Catalog. Even having gone without updates for well over a year now, it's far more accurate.
https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/249475
"Catholic Church registers of baptisms and marriages from the parish of Santa Lucía, Virgen y Mártir in the district of Barracas, city of Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, Argentina."
1 -
Wow, each of the items migrated the exact Catalog information correctly:
except for the place (in red) that was either AI/place standardized (I assume that is what Unknown means) does appear to be incorrect. @NatDB Good catch!
Jul 17, 2022 Changed at 5:34:17 AM by Unknown: shows that is when this place change was made - if this is the AI Place Standardization routine - it needs to differentiate between Parraquia Santa Lucía Virgen y Mártir, Barracas barrio de Buenos Aires, Distrito Federal, Argentina (found in the Notes of Catalog page - 9422760 in FamilySearch places database) and 9419973 Santa Lucia, Santa Lucía, San Pedro, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Again my assumption is that this migration did not have the bounding place location to keep the record associated within those boundaries. May I suggest that the coordinates or boundaries for records be included in the future so that this place Standardization type error does not continue in the future?
0 -
There is a feedback tab on the left side of the link you provided. Click on that and choose an emoji and then you can detail the error and submit your feedback.
0
