Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Search

This Document Is Erroneously Identified

JanetAppleby1
JanetAppleby1 ✭
February 12 edited February 12 in Search

And It Took Way Too Long For Me To Find A Way To Contact You!

At this link, and with this citation:

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:W1W8-PXN2

"South Carolina, Charleston District, Estate inventories, 1732-1844," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:W1W8-PXN2 : 12 March 2020), Samuel Gardner, 18 Nov 1797; citing Court, Charleston, South Carolina, United States, L10136, South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.

Record type: Inventories of Estates, Affiliate Film Number: 0194638, Digital Folder Number: 004754685, Image Number: 00740, p. 289

samuel gardner error on family search.jpg


The attached document is not as identified. You have it listed as pg. 289. It is actually pgs. 294-295. You indicate it contains records of Samuel Gardner. It does not. It contains records of: 

1) “Bonds, Notes and __ Due the Estate of Saml Milhous deceased”;

2) Inventory and Appraisement of the Personal Estate of William Duncan;

3) Inventory and Appraisement of the Effects of the Estate of Mrs. Elizabeth Richards; and 4) Inventory and Appraisement of all and singular the Goods and chattels of Lewis Rogers

Tagged:
  • Errors in documents
0

Answers

  • Áine Ní Donnghaile
    Áine Ní Donnghaile ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 12 edited February 12

    You can edit at least some of the details on that index -

    image.png


    0
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 13

    It looks like many (possibly all) of the index-to-image associations are messed up in that collection: I searched the film for one of the names that's actually on the image, Lewis Rogers, and he's in the index twice, identically except for the URL (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:W176-6ZMM and https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:W1WQ-SSW2) -- but both of those index entries are incorrectly linked to image 165 instead of 161.

    @Áine Ní Donnghaile, unfortunately, index correction doesn't really apply here -- I'm sure most of Mr. Gardner's entry is correct. It's just not on the linked image, and most likely not on that film: I checked the in-document indexes for all four items on it, and none of them list a Samuel Gardner. There's a typo in the metadata somewhere -- film number, image number, date, or some combination.

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30K All Categories
  • 24.1K FamilySearch Help
  • 122 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 635 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups